Social Security Rejects Marriage Papers
At first glance, one might ask legitimately why Social Security can't tell a homosexual "marriage certificate" from a regular heterosexual one. The answer is painfully simple: epicene names, or names that can apply equally to men or women. Epicene naming is itself a symptom of a larger social problem of which the whole "gay marriage" issue is the biggest blow-up: the deliberate blurring of gender distinctions in modern society.
People would do well to go back to giving their children readily identifiable boys' and girls' names. Gender identity is not just a social convention for its own sake. Your gender is as much about who you are as anything else about you. The problem, of course, is that too many women found that they could no longer take any pride in being women--so now they don't want the men to take any pride in being men. Then they wonder "where all the good men are"--if they're not seeking to redirect their sexual passions toward their fellow women, and wishing that all women would do the same. (And as to the men who redirect their sexual passions, I suspect that they don't know what they want, and haven't been able to figure that out for years.)
Actions have consequences. It's about time that any Federal agency gave a sharp reminder of that maxim to those who thought they could ignore it.
<< Home