NewsMax.com: Viagra Welfare Spurs New Sex Attacks
Many things are wrong with this. First, the Constitution nowhere authorizes Congress to provide any sort of drug. Second, even if it did, impotency is not a life-threatening condition. The syndrome of men trying to keep up with Studly Jones is itself of a piece with the oversexed attitude of our entire society.
As any really happily married couple knows, sexual potency, attractiveness, and all the rest of it is neither necessary nor sufficient to happiness in a marriage. Marriage, properly understood, is the deepest, most abiding personal friendship that a man and a woman can enter into. Or at least, it should be. If sexual attractiveness is the only reason to get married--well, no wonder our society is full of divorcées and serially married men who jump from one trophy wife to another. And as for striking up a sexual liaison without getting married--well, the Bible mentions that only to condemn it, and rightly so.
So why is the government giving sildenafil to people, when sildenafil is essentially an elective treatment, like breast augmentation? (And a dangerous one, too--we now hear that sildenafil can make you blind. And that's no joke.) Add to it that it has resulted in a rise in sexual crime.
Behold your tax dollars at work. I know that Romans 13:1-7 tells us to pay taxes to them to whom taxes are due. But we also ought to follow Paul's example and ask whether certain policies of our government are truly expedient or even lawful.
<< Home